9/11 Conspiracies Essay

On September 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists hijacked quaternity passenger airlines. Two of the flats flew into the twin towers one skim flew into the Pentagon and the other plane was aimed at Washington D.C., but was taken everyplace by passengers on the plane and crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. In total, nearly 3,000 people died including 227 civilians on the plane and 19 hijackers. These hijackers were supposed to be under the command of Osama Bin Laden, the head of the terrorist meeting Al Qaeda. However, the question of whether these attacks argon truly as the disposal has visualized or whether they actually part of a larger scheme to dislodge war in Iraq has come into light in recent years. numerous individuals criticize the news report told by the federal goernment and create transpose theories that inform many an(prenominal) confusion with the attacks.The most popular and convert of these theories is the controlled devastation and reach of the twin t owers by the federal giving medication. The radical side of the governmental left was the first to start the conspiracy theories concerning 9/11. People suffer always had a deep distrust of our government. The most convincing of the theories nearly 9/11 is the strategic placement of bombs in the tierce causeings to driving a collapse (News nonpareil, 2012). When you watch the videos of the collapsing towers, it looks desire a controlled demolition sooner of what one would expect from a mental synthesis just hit by a plane or collapsing from a fire (Brain, 2013). The buildings collapse in on themselves rather than burning from the bottom up which creates a giant amount of skepticism as to the accuracy of the story told by the government. So when people see something that doesnt make sense, such as how three buildings collapsed from a fire, it begs lots of questions (Brain, 2013). This allowed some(prenominal) curious conspirators with an abundance of time on their hands to snoop around and see what they could possibly find that would infract explain the actual cause of the collapse of the three buildings, disproving the formal story expressed by the government.It is overly important to understand how conspiracy theoristsbuild their case to perpetuate certain conspiracies. Upon examining the collapse of the wedlock tower, the south tower, and twin towers 7, it is easily determined that the collapse of these three buildings is not only unusual, it is most unbelievable. No skyscraper has ever collapsed by a fire alone however, on the day of the attacks, a blaze took down three separate towers. It is exceedingly improbable that such a fire would take down ii skyscrapers that stood 110 stories high and an additional building that was never touched by a plane. These discrepancies grant conspirators a form of credibility that makes their theories believable to many people. Although the official story may seem a bit anomalous, that doesnt necessaril y give a reason why people regard it.Scandals like the Iran-Contra affair with President Reagan and the Watergate Scandal with President Nixon create a deep distrust with many people and their government when such scandals testify that the government and its leaders deliberately mislead or lie to the public. So a great deal so that people often look to find things that the government could be lying about or covering up. When conspirators start to insert evidence for their theories, this same process occurs (Brain, 2013). After discovering scandals involving the federal government, its impracticable to trust all of the official stories told by the government. Furthermore, even if the collapse of the north and south towers is believable, the collapse of the third building is extremely difficult to consider as it was never touched by a plane. It seems unimaginable that a building that was never touched by anything except fire would only collapse if no tower has ever been complete ly destroyed by a fire before (911Truth, n.d.).According to Van Romero, an explosives expert and wickedness President of the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, at that place had to have been explosives in the building for it to have collapsed in such a demolition-like manner. Additionally, the controlled explosions that were theorized to have taken place in the towers have been accredited with puffs of dust and debris seen existence shot out from the building (Popular Mechanics, 2013). There is no way to explain the puffs of dust shooting out of the buildings from a mere fire that caused a collapse of the building without there existence an external force of explosions. Because of the mirthful circumstances of the 9/11 event, there must be some amount of skepticism. The government and its leaders argon historically proven to not be above lying to the public from instances likeWatergate and Iran-Contra affair. 9/11 could just as easily be the same way.Without clear a nswers to these questions the globe of an inwardly job is large and cannot be overlooked. Although there are many who refuse to believe the official story told by the federal government, there are also large quantities of people who do believe the official story. Many people consider the World Trade Center collapse as a highly unlikely scenario unless additional force was added to plant the building down. However, others find it extremely difficult to believe that the government would overstretch such an atrocity and would instead argue that the construction of the building and far-flung damage from debris were the main contributors to the collapse of the buildings (Popular Mechanics, 2013). Without solid proof, it is preposterous to believe a theory that does not have any facts or base of operations for the assertions that it makes. For example, many often believe that even if the terrorist attacks on 9/11 were true, there are yet some unanswered questions.Conspiracy theoris ts are quick to draw a link between the 9/11 attacks and the war in Iraq arrogateing it was a confession for invasion as alimentation of it being a government conspiracy. However, this is clearly false in that the justification in the intervention in Iraq was the risk that Sadam Hussein possessed weapons of sens destruction meaning that 9/11 was not needed as justification for the war in Iraq. Another reason the notion of inside job is ludicrous is because it would be impossible for all of the media to gloss over such an event had it been a governmental conspiracy. There are also no hard facts for conspirators to base their theories on meaning there is no reason to believe them.To understand the collapse of the towers it is important to understand the structure of the buildings. The twin towers were created exploitation innovative design. It was built with central core columns like most other buildings. However, instead of reinforcing the columns with fireproof concrete, they d ecided to fortify the columns using a sprayed on form of fire proofing called Passive fire proofing, which was much faster but also less effective (debunking911). This is what allowed the kibibyte provide from the plane to be so deadly. Many people argue that jet fuel is not near hot enough to melt blade, which is actually true. However, jet fuel burns between 800 and 1500 degrees Fahrenheit while the melting point of steel is around 2750 degrees Fahrenheit. approximately experts agree though that the steel doesnt need to melt for the entire building tocollapse. According to Farid Alfawak-hiri, the fourth-year engineer of the American Institute of stigma Construction says that at 1100 degrees Fahrenheit, Steel loses 50 percent of its strength. At 1800 degrees Fahrenheit, Steel is less than 10 percent.This immense heat can then cause Steel to become out to(p) and warped which can in turn collapse the entire building (Popular Mechanics 2013). The first plane crashed into the 94 th through the 98th floors of the first tower the game plane crashed into the 78th through 84th floors of the south building. Additionally, there was damage in twain of the lobbies of the buildings before the collapse of the two towers. Conspirators make a common claim that the planes could not have caused that much damage to go through over 80 floors to reach the lobby without some sort of explosive material. However, The case institutes of Standards and Technology released a report revealing that the debris of the plane had sliced through the elevator shaft which created an outlet for jet fuel. If the fuel came into come to with any combustible sources, it would immediately explode causing severe damage. commons fuel traveling down the elevator shaft would cause encompassing damage to the lobby as well. A similar observation as to the cause of the damage in the lobby was noted in the siemenss building also (Popular Mechanics 2013). This fact illustrates the improbability of explosives being needed to cause a collapse of the skyscrapers. Despite the plethora of convincing theories about the attack of September 11th, many people will still continue to remain unconvinced due to the lack of evidence, even if the government was truly involved with the collapse of the twin towers. Furthermore, people who dont believe the conspiracies about the twin towers would contend that the actual structure of the building and the intense launching of debris from the crash were the causes to the collapse of the towers, not bombs lay by the government. The lack of factual evidence on the side of the conscripts joined with the overwhelming evidence that the government was not involved makes it nearly impossible to believe that 9/11 was an inside job.ReferencesBrain, M. (n.d.). How Conspiracy Theories Work. HowStuffWorks. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http//people.howstuffworks.com/conspiracy-theory2.htm Debunking 9/11Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Myth s Government Planning. (n.d.). Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Myths Government Planning. Retrieved February 3, 2014, from http//www.debunking911.com/meeting.htm Popular Mechanics. (n.d.). Debunking the 9/11 Myths Special Report The World Trade Center. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http//www.popularmechanics.com/technology/ military machine/news/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center Reality Check More Americans are Rethinking 9/11 9/11?. (n.d.). 911Truthorg. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http//www.911truth.org/tag/controlled-demolition/ The 11 Most Compelling 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. (2012, September 11). News One RSS. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http//newsone.com/742485/the-11-most-compelling-911-conspiracy-theories/