To See and Not See Essay Example for Free

To See and not See EssayHave you ever been screenland and then regained your order of battle even for a undersized while? Heres another interesting dubiousness. If you fork out been blind and regained your sight for just a little while then, how would you commend and how would you purport? It is imaginable that you might experience happiness and excitement at being able to debate a world that had been hidden from you for so long then, after a bit you might experience anger and frustration because of the difficulty adjusting to lifetime as a perceive person. whence, it should come as no surprise that these and some(prenominal) other emotions were matte up by Virgil, Amy, and his family when he regained his sight after being blind for most of his life. However, despite an operation to regain his sight Virgil loses his sight again. some(prenominal) the book To See and Not See by Oliver Sacks and the dramatic movie called Love at counterbalance Sight starring Val Kilm er as Virgil and Mira Sorvino as Amy tell Virgils remarkable trading floor as his travels from tincture to light back to darkness again. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the story and the movie. In addition, I will provide some personal reflection concerning how I would function in everyday life if I were blind. The movie called At First Sight and the story To See and Not See has many differences. Some differences between the story and the movie are of import to how the reader/viewer makes note of the gravestone differences and some differences between the story and the movie arent important to how the reader/viewer look at the differences between the two mediums.There are many cuticle studies of other blind spate who check regained their sight for a while just like Virgils case. In fact, the story illustrated these other case studies such as a patient who went by the initials H.S. in order to compare and track Virgil draw near and regression after the o peration (Sacks, 1994, 10). The movie didnt talk about other people who had been blind almost the entire lives and then regained their sight for a short time. This difference isnt important to the valuation of the two mediums. In contrast, there is a difference between the story and the movie that does make an important difference in looking at the key points between the two genres. In the story Virgil and Amy had met and date many years onwards they met again and ultimately married and in the movie Amy and Virgil had never met forward they met at the spa. In addition, Amy in the movie had never been married and Amy in the story had been married before when she met Virgil.This is an important difference because some people when they get down gone through life changing events such as moving and divorce would contact someone they liked and felt comfortable around. Therefore, it makes double-dyed(a) find that Amy would contact Virgil who she had dated before and felt comfortable with him. Also, the fact that in the story Amy and Virgil got married and in the movie Amy and Virgil are just dating make a huge difference because married people might stay together in times of crisis and a dating couple may take root that being together in times of crisis isnt worth it and they may break up. Also, I think that the fact that Amy has health problems in the story and she doesnt have health problems in the movie provides her with opposite motivations for Virgil having the operation to restore his vision. In the movie At First Sight, Amy motivation for Virgil having the operation may be grounded in the fact that they are involved in a new love relationship. Also, she could wish Virgil to have the eye surgery because she is a perfectionist and if he has the operation to restore he will be perfect in her eyes (At First Sight, 1999). In the movie it seems as if Amy equates having the operation with having the perfect life with Virgil.In contrast, Amy in the story has h ealth problems herself such as diabetes and asthma. In fact, Amy had to quit her job as a botanist due to her asthma (Sacks, 1994, 5). In the story, it seems as if Amys motivation for Virgil having the operation involves trying to champion Virgil get better using the doctors that Amy uses to help her with her eye check ups due to diabetes (Sacks, 1994, 5). Due to the different motivations that declare for Virgil having the operation the viewer of the movie might see Amy as selfish whereas the reader might feel for Amy and root for her and Virgil because of their health problems. I think that it is hard to give a concrete answer to the question whether operations to restore sight should be performed. It seems as if both in the movie and in the story Virgil had much problems when he could see than when he was blind. In the story when Virgil was blind he enjoyed life more because he loved going to the zoo to touch the gorillas and the giraffes. He also loved listening to baseball g ame games when he was blind. However, when he could see and he went to the zoo he wasnt allowed to touch any of the animals. Therefore he didnt enjoy the zoo. Also, he disconnected his job due to complications from the operation (Sacks, 1994, 15, 20).Therefore, it seems that Virgil had freedom and license when he was blind and he acted like a scared little child when he could see a bit. In fact, in the movie Virgil screams when he hears loud horns and sees bright colored cars coming at him (At First Sight, 1999). Therefore, based on these two examples it would seem that there needs to be more give-and-take and thought before allowing operations that restore sight. I think that people who have had their sight restored should have the option to have a Seeing Eye dog until they adjust to the world as a sighted person. If I were blind then, I would have to have to have much help in learning to adjust to not being able to see. I am an avid reader and I love to cook and bake. Therefore , it would be hard getting used to reading with my hands and learning a different way of cooking and baking. I would be frustrated if I regained my sight and then lost it again I feel for Virgil in both the story and as I watched the movie. However, I felt more sympathy for Amy in the story rather than Amy in the movie. I think the moral of both the story and the movie is sight doesnt always give you the freedom or perfection that you seek.