Assessment Aims in Science Lessons

appraisal Aims in light LessonsDiscuss, evaluate and formulate upon the engineers of prisement for development in ancient acquirement, and consider strategies that may be busy to identify childrens strengths and weaknesses. designate how appraisal reading can be charged to varan childrens carry on in light, and inform and train quality instruct and nurture. display lore became a core subject for primal schools in 1989 with the mental institution of the matter Curriculum. Primary scholarship has a broad agenda, an master(prenominal) fraction of which is the development of scientific literacy in the population (Howe et al., 2005, p.5), the scientific understanding that should be part of every whizs education. Teachers plunge a responsibility to ensure that childrens experiences in indigenous intuition be positive ones so that much children pass on under draw off post primary lore subjects. judicial decision for acquire, an big element of primary inf ormation, has come to prominence in educational form _or_ system of government because of its perceived potential to underpin lifelong acquisition (Black et al., 2006, p.120). Described as a teaching strategy of very high leverage (Howe, 2004, cited in Marshall Drummond, 2006, p.133), judgement for knowledge allows teachers to track educatee learning and carry on and intent quality teaching using enamor strategies.Aims of Primary cognition commandmentChildren control m any ideas roughly the mankind and how it works earlier they come to school and experience light in the context of their mundane lives, for example ab step to the fore children will render some knowledge slightly plants and animals, or will understand that a lolly melts. The most all- in-chief(postnominal)(prenominal) aim of primary skill is to foster childrens appreciation of the worldly concern around us, to encourage a close watching of our physical environment, and to develop an understanding of how disparate aspects of it be related to (Howe et al., 2005, p.6).Views close to science adjudge changed in recent decades with a recognition that transmission modes for teaching in science are not appropriate (Gray Bryce, 2006, p.171). A spend a pennyivist view of teaching science has been adopted which recognises that children learn best when they are able to compel tonic ideas and concepts from existing ones. In order to teach primary science stiffly, teachers must have a sound subject knowledge and an appropriate understanding of these constructivist theories (Traianou, 2996, p.828). Key Stage one children, for example, learn a deal virtually science through play and ideas must be grow in experiences that are meaningful to them. Effective learning in science cannot be facilitated by providing children with facts and information becauseFacts unrelated to concepts that children already have are meaningless and because of no use to them.Children use their own ide as to construct understanding. While they may be able to recall answers, understanding only(prenominal) evolves show up of their own experience.(Harlen Jelly, 1998, p.26).Science is very much a wreak based subject in which learners develop their understanding of things around them by using and developing subroutine skills (Harlen Qualter, 2004, p.133). Effective legal opinion in science should be reflective of this by universe an ongoing process in the schoolroom.The Primary Science CurriculumOne of the main ideas in the National Curriculum is that of scientific enquiry which is seen as learning about ideas and shew and three stands of investigative skills planning, obtaining and presenting evidence and evaluating (Howe et al.,2005, p.8). Each strand consists of a number of processes which are to be taught through the subject areas of life processes and support things, materials and their properties and physical processes. A practical near to learning in science is vital for primary school children. The teachers role as learning facilitator centres on creating a rich and stimulating learning environment, allowing children to seek and test their ideas. At every stage in the science process, quarrel skills can be developed to assist the learning of science and misdeed versa (Sherrington, 1993, p.206).Assessment begins from the runner and it is useful to start science teaching with an activity to mention out what children know about a topic before beginning teaching, paying particular vigilance to the wording children use..Assessment in ScienceAssessment is a process of deciding, collecting and making inferences or judgements about evidence of childrens learning and skills (Harlen Qualter, 2004, p.121). One of the main conclusions arrived at by the Children instruction in Science Project (CLISP) is the importance of establishing whether children have any misconceptions about scientific concepts and addressing these before moving on. Effective assessment is therefore crucial for primary science as pre-conceived ideas can have an ominous effect on learning.There are two main areas in assessment, pliant and summative. constructive assessment, an ongoing process for the teacher, provides immediate evidence of learning and should be used to inform planning for teaching. Gathering information about learning and giving feedback while it is in progress has been seen as a crucial aspect of teaching since the Task grouping on Assessment and Testing (TGAT) report was published in 1988 (MacGilchrist et al., 2006, p.84). It has a number of strengths because of its focus on learners and how they learn.Summative assessment is generally administered to gather evidence of learning at the end of the teaching period. It has often been criticised as failing to take a holistic view of the learner. A comprehensive science design will incorporate both elements but the plastic assessment will be of most use to the teacher on a daily al -Qaida.The Purposes of AssessmentAssessment is a statutory requirement for teachers. Section 3.2 of the Requirements for passing play to Teach has a range of requirements in respect of monitoring and assessment, among them that teachers monitor and assess as they teach, giving immediate and constructive feedback to support pupils as they learn. They involve pupils in reflecting on, evaluating and improving their own performance (TTA, 2002, p.11).Assessment enables teachers to square off how effectively children have been learning in science. It has a number of aims includingTo assistant childrens learning by identifying what they are making grave progress with and areas in which they take up further support.To summarise doings at certain times.(Harlen Qualter, 2004, p.124).This has important implications for primary science teaching in light research suggesting that children have many misconceptions in respect of scientific concepts. Harlen and Jelly have report that misconce ptions in science arise fromAttributing an effect to a particular swash and not having an understanding that a number of factors may be operating.A lack of awareness that there may be more than one explanation.Not understanding science vocabulary.Insufficient opportunity to test ideas and talk of findings.A lack of access to alternative ideas that might provide a better explanation.(Harlen Jelly, 1998, p.24).Effective assessment can address this by being an integral part of activities, with teachers constantly seeking information that enables them to support learning and give appropriate feedback. The teacher can then diagnose learning responses and needs, and note the progress that is being made (MacGilchrist et al., 2006, p.85). Formative assessment methods have received attention in recent years, being more worthy to achieving the goals ofLearning with understanding mind learninghighlighted by the Assessment right Group as being crucial in the aim to equip learners for a p lace in a rapidly shrinking world and changing society (Assessment Reform Group, 2006, p.8).Methods of Assessing Childrens Progress in ScienceA substantial amount of learning in science occurs impertinent school, being accessed through field trips, zoos, science museums etc. (Braund Reiss, 2006, p.214). Because of this teachers must have a range of ship canal of gathering evidence to assess pupil learning and understanding and be able to use this as the basis for attendant teaching.Methods that the teacher can use includeObserving children as they work- the teacher can gauge learning by listening to the ways in which children work their way through an activity, with particular attention to their use of scientific vocabulary. The language used by the children is a very good indicator of their understanding. Open-ended teacher questioning gives children opportunities to express their ideas and develop them. query shows that where lay out scientific language is taught, children de velop more accurate scientific concepts (Sparks-Linfield Warwick, 1998, p.128).Studying childrens work in relation to a assess drawings, reports and written work. For this to be most effective, it is important that the assign requirements are clear. For example, if the aim is to assess childrens understanding of the structure of a flowering plant, it is important that the children are not simply asked to draw a flower, but that the task requires the parts to be labelled or signald in some way.Administering tests related to the learning activity.Having a plenary session where the children can talk about what they think they have learned from a task or activity.Involving Children in the Assessment addressCentral to formative assessment is the idea of involving children in their learning. Black and William found that self and peer assessment in children as young as five was successful in raising achievement (Black William, 1998). The effectiveness of involving children in the as sessment process stems from an understanding that children learn most effectively when they have opportunities to build new ideas on existing experiences. For this draw near to be successful, it has to be carefully planned for by the teacher. The children need a clear understanding of the learning intentions of a lesson to be able to assess if they have achieved them.The teacher must be very explicit, particularly in relation to processes within science. If it is not clear that the learning intention is process based, children tend to focus on their answers rather that the methods used for obtaining them. Harlen Qualter point out that when children understand what they should be doing and how well, they are in a position to component in deciding the next steps to be taken (Harlen Qualter, 2004, p.179). This approach does not suggest a lack of rigour in toll of assessment, the ultimate decisions in the management of which are teacher directed.Assessing Childrens Process SkillsCh ildren use the process skills they have developed when they engage with tasks. Teacher observation is very important here but it is important for teachers to be aware that some types of behaviour are more indicative of learning than others and to be able to differentiate between them. The teacher needs to consider what would indicate that a child is giveing a particular skill, for example observation. In this deterrent example the teacher might look for evidence of the child paying attention to detail, really exploring an object. The degree to which a particular skill is being employed will likewise be different for older and young children. With younger children it is most important to develop positive attitudes to science and to give children opportunities to be scientists through access to a range of science equipment and to nurture correct use of scientific vocabulary. victimisation assessment to improve learning in scienceEvidence gathered by the teacher must be used to make judgements regarding the effectiveness of the learning. This process can be raise by discussion with the children. Harlen and Qualter have identified three reasons for using assessment to help learning in scienceKnowing what ideas learners bring to new experiences and how these ideas develop during their activities is central to learning through enquiry. Using assessment as part of the teaching means that information can be smooth about progress towards goals. If activities provide opportunities for skills, understanding and attitudes to be developed, then they also provide opportunities for these to be assessed and for the information to be used to help learning.wide accepted theories of learning emphasis the role of learners in constructing their own understanding, the constructivist approach. Formative assessment involves children in recognising where they are in progress towards goals and in the decisions about what their next steps are and how to take them.There is firmly o pen up evidence that when the key components of formative assessment are practised, levels of achievement are raised.(Harlen Qualter, 2004, p.132).Assessing Childrens Ideas in ScienceChildren have many ideas about science when they start school. It is important to establish what these are and plan teaching accordingly. news is extremely important in primary science and teachers must hit a climate in which children can express ideas with confidence. Keogh and Naylor have pointed out the importance of thisIf we want children to think out loud, to be notional in their thinking and to argue about alternative possibilities, then we need to provide the kind of learning environment in which they feel satisfied to do that. They need to know they can make mistakes or give wrong answers and still feel good about themselves. (Keogh Naylor, 2004, p.18). Scientific language should be introduced when appropriate and in contexts that allow children to develop an awareness of the different me anings that words may have in everyday and scientific contexts.Using Assessment to Inform TeachingChildrens ideas, whether in oral or written form, often give an indication of experience or skills that are lacking. This is an important consideration when planning teaching. When children are displaying a lack of experience, it is required to provide experiences for them. For example, organising a trip to the local park to investigate sustainment things. Children often have ideas about science which may not reflect reality and can be difficult to change. In this case it is necessity to scaffold and model alternative explanations for children. It is important that teachers use assessment information and evidence to address any misunderstandings or misconceptions that children may have. The strength of formative approaches to assessment is that difficulties can be addressed in the short line before misconceptions are too well cemented.ConclusionThe Government believes that primary e ducation is aboutChildren experiencing the joy of discovery, solving problems, being creative in writing, art and music, developing their confidence as learners and maturing socially and emotionally (DfES, 2003, p.4). discovery and problem solving are central to science teaching and an effective programme for assessment can be used to facilitate this by enabling teachers to plan and devise lessons accordingly. explore has shown that implementing the essential features of formative assessment in classrooms leads to gains in achievement that are greater than those of equivalent groups where formative assessment is not practised (Harlen Qualter, 2004, 137).Marshall Drummond have pointed out that assessment for learning demands a high degree of organisation in the classroom if it is going to help pupils become independent learners (Marshall Drummond, 2006). It is essential that teachers feel sufficiently confident in respect of subject knowledge pertaining to science and plan intera ctive lessons for children that mirror the interactive nature of assessment for learning.In science learning children must begin with what they know. The teacher must therefore employ a range of strategies for gathering this information and must apply it to subsequent teaching. This can lead to quality teaching and learning in science and to positive experiences for children and their teachers.ReferencesAssessment Reform Group (2006) The Role of Teachers in the Assessment of Learning. retrieved from www.assessment-reform-group.org 18.01.07.Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M. Pedder, D. (2006) Learning how to learn and assessment for learning A theoretical inquiry. explore Papers in Education, 21, 2, 119-132.Black, P. William, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 1, 7-74.Boyle,B. Bragg, J. (2006) A Curriculum Without Foundation. British educational Research Journal 32,(4), 569-582.Braund, M. Reiss, M. (2006) Validity and outlay in the Scien ce Curriculum Learning give instruction Science out of doors the Laboratory. The Curriculum Journal, 17, 3, 213-228.Buldu,M. (2006) Young Childrens Perceptions of Scientists A Preliminary Study. Educational Research, 48, 1, 121-132.Bullock, K. Muschamp, Y. (2006) Learning about learning in the primary school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 1, 49-62.Cameron, L. (2002) Metaphors in the learning of science A discourse focus. British Educational Research Journal. 28, 5, 637-688.Carr, J. J. (1993) The cheat of Science A Practical Guide to Experiments, Observations and Handling Data. San DiegoHighText Publications.Cheney, A., Flavell, H., Harrison, C, Hurst, G. Yates, C. (2002) Thinking done Science. capital of the United Kingdom John Murray PublishersClarina R.B. Koul, R. (2006) The Effects of Different Forms of Feedback on Fuzzy and exact Memory of Science Principles. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 76, 259-270.Coles, M., Gott, R. Thornley, T. (1988) Active Scie nce Teachers Guide. capital of the United Kingdom Collins Educational.Department For Education and Skills (DfES)(2003) righteousness and Enjoyment. capital of the United Kingdom DfES.Driessen,G., Smit, F. Slegers, P. (2005) Parental Involvement and Educational Achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 4, 509-532.Gray, D.S. Bryce,T. (2006) Socio-Scientific Issues in Science Education Implications for the Professional Development of Teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education. 16, 2, 171-192.Harlen,W. (2001) The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. capital of the United Kingdom David Fulton Publishers.Harlen, W. Jelly, S. (1998) Developing Science in the Primary Classroom. London Longman.Harlen, W. Qualter, A. (2004)(4th edition) The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. London David Fulton Publishers.Hollins, M. Whitby, V. (1999) Progression in Primary Science A Guide to the genius and Practice in Key Stages 1 and 2. London David Fulton Publishers.Howe, A., Davi es, D., McMahon, K., Towler, L. Scott, T. (2005) Science 5-11 A Guide for Teachers. London David Fulton Publishers.Jenkins, E.W. (2006) School science and citizenship Whose science and whose citizenship? The Curriculum Journal, 17, 3, 197-211.Keogh, B. Naylor, S. (2004) Childrens ideas, childrens feelings. Primary Science Review, 82, 18-20.Kennedy, J. (Ed.) (1997) Primary Science Knowledge and Understanding. LondonRoutledge.Layton, D. (1973) Science for the People The Origins of the School Science Curriculum in England. London Allen and Unwin.Lunn, S. (2002) What We Think We Can Safely Say. Primary Teachers Views on the character of Science. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 5, 649-672.MacGilchrist, B., Myers, K. Reed, J. (2006) The Intelligent School. London Sage Publications.Marshall, B. Drummond, M.J. (2006) How teachers engage with assessment for learning lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21, 2, 133-149.Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H. Novak, J. D. (2005) Assessing Science Understanding A Human Constructivist View. San Diego Elsevier Academic Press.OHear, P White,J. (1993) Assessing the National Curriculum. London Paul Chapman.Osborne, R, Freyberg, P. (1991) Learning in Science The Implications of Childrens Science. Auckland Heinemann.Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (QCA)(2000) Standards at Key Stage 2 English, Mathematics and Science A key out for Headteachers, Class Teachers and Assessment Co-Ordinators on the 2000 National Curriculum Assessments for 11 course Olds.Rubie-Davies, C., Hattie, J. Hamilton, R. (2006) Expecting the Best for Students Teacher Expectation and Academic Outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 429-444.Sherrington, R. (1993) Science and speech communication in R. Sherrington (Ed.) ASE Primary Science Teachers Handbook. Hemel Hempstead Simon and Schuster Education.Sparks-Linfield, R. Warwick, P. (1998) Use of Language Across the Primary Curriculum. London Routledge.Sum mers, M. (1994) Science in the Primary School The Problem of Teachers Curricular Expertise. The Curriculum Journal, 5, 2, 179-193.Sutton,C. (1992) Words, Science and Learning. Buckingham Open University Press.Task Group on Assessment and Testing (1988) Report. London DES.Teacher Training position (TTA) (2002) Qualifying to Teach Professional Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and Requirements for sign Teacher Training. London TTA.Traianou. A. (2006) Teachers adequacy of subject knowledge in primary science Assessing constructivist approaches from a socio-cultural perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 8, 827-842.Tymms,P. (2004) Are Standards acclivitous in English Primary Schools? British Educational Research Journal. 30, 4 ,477-494.Von Secker, C. (2004) Science achievements in social contexts Analysis from National assessment of educational progress. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 2, 67-78.Ziman, J. (2000) Real Science What it is and What it Means . Cambridge Cambridge University Press.