Political Dynasty Essay Example for Free

Political Dynasty EssayThe Filipino musical composition is a affectionate Contract which embodies the fundamental principles and policies, according to which the Filipino volume are g all overned by the State. The fundamental principles are abstract and as such they cover every aspect of the life of the Filipino people while the fundamental policies cover specific areas of application of those principles. The fundamental principles stick around fixed and permanent, that the policies built upon those principles can be modified or repealed by legislation to suit the needs of the times. The act is product of my out of the box philosophizing about the provisions of voice 1 and parting 26 taken together of Article II of our Constitution. I essential say that philosophizing does not publish us my conclusions and/or thoughts are powerful or wrong, true or false, but it has certainly inclined me the basis upon which to present my meta- chthonicstanding of partition 1 and S ection 26 Article II, Section 1 says The Philippines is a democratic and republican state. Sovereignty resides in the people and each(prenominal) government authority emanates from them. This is the most canonical principle of the Constitution, and it refers to a natural police force as formulated and accepted in the mind it refers alike to essential truth upon which different truths are establish. Article II, Section 26 The State shall guarantee partake access to opportunities for public wait on, and prohibit semipolitical dynasties as may be defined by law. This is a polity built upon the principle of Section 1, and it refers to a planned line of conduct in the get of which individual decisions on political dynasties are made and coordination is achieved.Moreover, political dynasties refer to the line of politicians of the same families. every coin has two inseparable opposite sides the head and the tail yet they complement each other as they are opposed to each other to constitute only one coin. Similarly, the political electrical outlet on dynasty has two opposite yet complementary sides (a) the principle of political dynasty of Section 1 and (b) the the policy of political dynasty of Section 26. Both Sections constitute one Article II. The policy of Section 26 name the specific area of application of the principle of Section 1 of the same Article II.The policy of Section 26 is built upon the basic principle of Section 1. Moreover, the fundamental principle of Section 1 remain fixed and permanent, but policies of Section 3 can be are modified or repealed by legislation to suit the needs and demands of the times. The People The Creators and Masters of Political Dynasties The phrase sovereignty resides in the people, and all government authority emanates from them clearly shows that the people are the habitat of the sovereignty.However, people obtain two manifest yet mutually complementary meanings, namely, people as electorate which is th e source of political causation of elected politicians and people as corporate nation which is the reason for being of elected politicians. These dual meanings of people effectively imply that the elected politicians are public servants of the people hence the people are their boss and master in our democratic and republican state, not the way around By virtue of their sovereign power, the people are superior to any and all existing political dynasties, whose reason for being is swear out to their masters, the people.On good grounds, the people must be awakened to the reality that they are the boss of political dynasties, and therefore they have no reason to fear the, before, during, and after political elections. Centrality of Morality in the Constitution The centrality of morality to our Constitution is evident in the Preamble, in the imploration to Almighty God for aid to build a just and compassionate society and to establish a Government that shall embody the Filipino idea ls and aspirations and promote their common good under a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace.The rest of the Constitution revolves around these moral ideals and moral values. These are the moral basiss of the Social Ethics Society. There are socio-economic phenomena in many areas of the country where the life-style and the exercise of political power by political dynasties is betrayal of public trust, because it is not in accord with the following moral imperatives and criteria of chasten and wrong in public service Public office is a public trust.Public officers and employees must at all times accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency act with patriotism and justice, and transcend modest life. (Article X on Accountability) Every elected politician in the public service is bound to abide by those mandates. Congress had passed anti-graft and anti- muffion laws, e. g. RA No. 6713, also known as com mand of Ethics for Government Officials and Employees, in the public service. However, it appears that many of our elected politicians pay only lip service to anti-Graft and Anti-Corruptions laws.For instance, there are widespread phenomena of bribery and corruption in the public service, reportedly perpetuated by corrupt politician, many of whom are allegedly members of political dynasties. Centrality of Morality to Legality The Preamble provides the moral grounds and the foundation of estimable politics of several Articles of the Constitution. No statutory law is enforceable if it is un implicit in(p) and the Constitution cannot be enforced if it is immoral. The bottom line any enable law on political dynasty is reasonedly backbone upon the Filipinos, only if it is constitutional and moral.A law that is moral is always constitutional, but a law that is constitutional is not necessarily moral. A Moral and Ethical Proposal I believe the policy of Section 26 which prohibits polit ical dynasties as may be defined by law has two plain opposite sides, (1) the letter of the Constitution which is the legalistic side, and (2) the spirit of the Constitution which is the ethical side. The pro-political dynasty advocates and promoters behave in accord with legal politics.Their action is legal so long as there is no law defining and enabling the constitutional prohibition against political dynasties. Therefore, the anti-dynasty advocates and promoters should stand on moral and ethical grounds against political dynasties. It is my device on moral and ethical grounds that the anti-dynasty advocates should develop and promote the concept of political dynasty of the people based on the principle of Section 1 face-to-face the political dynasties of oligarchs based on the policy of Section 26 but built upon the principle of Section 1.When there is a conflict between a principle and its policy, the principle should prevail over its policy. Moral, Ethical, and Legal Practic es in Politics Moral and ethical are similar in meaning in that they both have to do with the difference between right and wrong. They are dissimilar in meaning in that ethical tends to refer to a code, system, theory, or prototype of judging rightness or wrongness of moral behavior whereas moral tends to refer to more cover choices and issues that arouse strong feelings.In other words, moral refers to good and evil, while ethical refers to right and wrong. Because of the mendacious disclosure of his SALN per Code of Ethics, former SC Chief Justice Renato Corona was found ethically absentminded for which he was impeached, despite his superior legalistic knowledge of law Hence, we could say that what is moral is always ethical, but what is ethical is not necessarily moral. Hence, when an elected politician acts according to RA 6714, his behavior is ethical as vigorous as legal what is ethical is always legal, but what is legal is not necessarily ethical.The pursuance of Ethic al Politics Our major problem in the pursuit of ethical politics is the lack of political will on the part of the people as electorate. Let us awaken and educate their political consciousness, and empower their political will by making them conscious of their being the political dynasty that is superior over all existing political dynasties of oligarchs per mandate of Article II, Section 1 that the people are the habitat of sovereign power, but the exercise of such pwer is delegated and vested upon elected politicians.Assume that Congress would never pass the law enabling the policy against political dynasties let us then resort to the principle of Section 1 in Article II. This principle does not require any enabling law because it is precisely the last basis of all enabling laws. This is the principle why the political candidates try to win the votes of the people during political campaigns. We have indeed laws prescribing the requirements of the policy to vote. The Social Ethics Society can start the movement to marginalize the political dynasties,, if not altogether eliminate them eventually from the political landscape of the Philippine.